how weird

(Had problems with my computer off and on today so I’m just now posting this — kinda late to comment on this, but I’m still gonna do it!)

So I saw the last five minutes of “Idol Gives Back” last night, the whole American Idol celebrity telethon they do each year now. I mean, I literally only saw the last five minutes. And for the finale, they had all the remaining singers on stage, in white, with a full gospel choir behind them, singing a worship song. An iconic worship song, in certain circles. Certainly in my circles. It’s a biggie called “Shout to the Lord.” Can’t say it’s my favorite, but, still; it’s stirring. It builds. It does its thing, dawg. But I just thought it was interesting. Well, weird, really. Guess I’m an old cynic or something because I have to wonder why American Idol used this song to end the show. Was it an appeal to the demographic they thought most likely to open their pocketbooks? I dunno. It sounded great, but still, I question it. Maybe it’s an issue of sincerity for me. I hate to be the one suggesting that there may be a wee bit of manipulation going on here.

So look at me not suggesting it. At all.

Wait. How weird, again. It’s the results show and they’re starting the show with “Shout to the Lord”! I’m weirded out. Am I in church? Is Joey gonna accost me? ‘Cause that makes me skeered. What is going on, for pity’s sake??

Oh, here’s the lyrics for “Shout to the Lord.” Do they seem American Idol-ly to you?

Shout to the Lord, all the earth, let us sing
Power and Majesty, praise to the King;
Mountains bow down and the seas will roar
At the sound of Your name.
I sing for joy at the work of your hands,
Forever I’ll love You, forever I’ll stand
Nothing compares to the promise I have in You.

My Jesus, my Savior, Lord, there is none like You;
All of my days I want to praise the wonders of Your mighty love.
My comfort, my shelter, tower of refuge and strength;
Let every breath, all that I am, never cease to worship You.

Chorus
Shout to the Lord, all the earth, let us sing
Power and Majesty, praise to the King;
Mountains bow down and the seas will roar
At the sound of Your name.
I sing for joy at the work of your hands,
Forever I’ll love You, forever I’ll stand
Nothing compares to the promise I have in You.

Shout to the Lord, all the earth, let us sing
Power and Majesty, praise to the King;
Mountains bow down and the seas will roar
At the sound of Your name.
I sing for joy at the work of your hands,
Forever I’ll love You, forever I’ll stand
Nothing compares to the promise I have…
Nothing compares to the promise I have…
Nothing compares to the promise I have in You.

Just wondering, is all.

is the word

HE: So the author of this book I’m reading has written a bunch of stuff on Greece.

ME: Really? What’s he written about grease??

HE: Oh, you know, just the history of it.

ME: Ohh, okay. The history of “Grease.”

HE: Yeah. You know, city-states, Olympics.

(a pause)

ME: Oh. Sure. Greece.

yellow haze: coda

Let’s be truthful, shall we? I mean, let’s try that around here for a change.

I’ve scoured the depths of my heart to discern my true motivation for reading Donkeyskin to my beloved niece. Well, first, I got waylaid because there are mocha chip cupcakes around here right now, and how can you scour the depths of your heart when there are mocha chip cupcakes around? You must eat the cupcakes and then scour. Which is what I did. When the sugar crash and loathing subsided, though, I was forced to see what was really there, my real motivation for the unfortunate, deranged reading of Donkeyskin.

And it’s this:

The story has a really pretty picture.

Yep. That’s it.

Actually, the whole book has wonderful illustrations. But when I was Piper’s age, around 7, I embarked on a course of subtle enhancements to these illustrations using my trusty Sharpie. Always an unobtrusive black or blue Sharpie because no one ever notices stuff done in black or blue Sharpie. It was all very subtle. I was Photoshop before Photoshop existed and proud of it, Peaches. I gave princesses eyeliner. Filled in eyebrows. Colored lips a pretty blue. Darkened eyelids. I basically defaced this beautiful book. All for the better, of course.

Now the illustration for the story of Donkeyskin was my favorite and, honestly, when I reached for the book to read the story to Piper, I thought it most likely had been spared any strokes of my imperious pen. I generally saved my ministrations for the less beautiful princesses who really needed them.

So when I finished reading the story, as we sat in the post-traumatic glow, I was eager to show Piper the picture to, you know, smooth things over. Offer the kid some visual opium. Make her forget. Sleeeep. “Poppies …. poppies ….”

Hm.

sc002fae89.jpg

Here’s a close-up.
sc0036f96d.jpg

Okay. So, fine. Gorgeous Donkeyskin has electric blue eyeliner, applied by little Tracey’s manic pen. I feel you can appreciate the electric blue even more against the soft black-and-white background, don’t you? And it’s nice to see how Sharpie color maintains its integrity after 7 decades in the shadows of neglect and whatnot. Please notify Consumer Reports immediately.

Still — color integrity notwithstanding — I was a little dismayed to see my Sharpie makeover when I held the picture up for Piper. I mean, I really thought Donkeyskin had been spared. Ah, well. I braced myself for her response. Piper studied the picture quietly and then said, “Tee Tee, what’s that blue on her eyes?”

“Well, that’s eyeliner, I suppose.”

“How did it get there?”

“Well, when I was about your age, I started to draw makeup on these princesses with a pen. I guess I thought it looked pretty.”

She sat up, reached out, and brushed her fingers across my long-ago markings. She regarded me for a moment with those clear blue eyes, then she said, “It’s really smooth. You did a good job, Tee Tee.”

“Thanks, sweetie.”

“Sure.”

espresso art

A friend of mine emailed me a bunch of pictures of cool espresso art. They’re too good to put them all up at once. So … one a day for the next week or so, to savor them.

coffee1.jpg
Pretty pretty! Makes me want to make a cappuccino right now — because I want to try this. Try being the operative word here.

hahaha!

Okay. Let me get this out of the way: What I’m about to say is totally self-serving. I’m kinda hating myself for it. Feel free to hate me, too. Briefly, if at all possible.

The Anchoress linked to the fairy tale horror below and has set up a Post-Traumatic Therapy Fund for Piper and me. Hahahaha. But check out her musings on the writer of the fairy tale; they’re hysterical.

(I left the link out at first. Good job, Trace.)

yellow haze

I learned something deeply disturbing about myself while Piper was here and I’ve been debating whether to spill it.

Well, okay. That’s a total lie. I didn’t debate it for one teensy-weensy moment. And it’s worse than being the liar I just proved myself to be.

Ready?

Here it is:

I am an unfit aunt.

And before you protest, “Oh, no, Tracey; you’re a great aunt” because you guys are nice that way, hear me out. Allow me to prove my incompetence. My unfitness. My complete and utter boobery. Okay?

Piper arrived late Easter afternoon. We painted, played games, watched a movie, etc. We talked about how she wants to be a designer. “But I wouldn’t use animal fur.” Okay. Good to know. Don’t wear my chinchilla wrap around Piper. Got it.

So it’s bedtime and she’s laying her sleeping bag on the “balloon bed” (aka the inflatable mattress). Her stuffed animals are then lovingly crammed into the sack before she climbs in on top of them. She’s very ritualistic about how she crams them in, the order in which they are crammed, and precisely how she slides in on top of the poor crammed animals. I offer to help her, but she’s got a system, you see. I get out my childhood fairy tale book, the one with the cover held in place by the merest molecules of decades-old masking tape. “Wow. That’s old, Tee Tee.” “Yep. It’s from the last century,” I say in a hushed tone. She smiles and watches as I flip the huge pages to find the story I’m going to read her. One of my favorites when I was a kid.

It’s called Donkeyskin.

Now ….

As much as I remember loving this story, I seem to have forgotten, in the yellow haze of age, some basic truths about the story of Donkeyskin.

The first of which being the fact that, as the story progresses, a donkey skin plays a pivotal part.

The second one being the fact that the title of the story, DONKEYSKIN, writ large above the story in a huge decorative font, might have offered the reader a clue as to the first fact.

However, it would appear that the yellow haze of age has also taken with it things like reading comprehension because I sit there and look at the title of the story, the title that basically screams DONKEYSKIN!! and do not comprehend what that could possibly mean or imply. I can’t say that I didn’t see it — the yellow haze of age hasn’t taken that yet — but it just didn’t register. It was a blip, a dot, a non-issue.

I forge ahead, eager to share a childhood favorite with my niece.

The basic setup for Donkeyskin is this: Handsome king and beautiful queen have a beautiful daughter and a magic donkey that poos gold. The beautiful queen falls deathly ill, and in a final beautifully bitchy act, makes the handsome king promise never to marry again unless he finds a woman as beautiful and virtuous as she. Beautiful queen dies happy — haha! — because she knows he will never ever find a woman like her. All manipulative and perfect and such.

So I’m reading along and ….. oh.

Hm.

Guess what?

Seems the handsome king searches far and wide for a replacement wife who matches the dead wife’s criteria. He comes up with bupkis.

So… as the story goes …. the lonely king decides … and I’d forgotten this through the yellow haze of age ….

“The only princess fairer and better than his late wife was his own daughter.”

Yep. You heard it. Fairy-tale incest. Awesome, Tee Tee.

But do I, Tee Tee, stop reading at this hint of possible fairy-tale incest?

No.

No, I do not.

“He told his daughter that he would marry her, since she alone met with the conditions of his promise.”

Piper stares up at me from the balloon bed, blue eyes huge and shocked and I don’t like this look. Make it go away. That’s the look for later, when she finds out about Santa; that’s not the look for here and now, for me, Tee Tee. She opens her mouth and starts to whisper, ” But, Tee Tee ….” I interrupt her, laugh gamely, and talk fast. “Oh, haha. Isn’t that silly? He can’t marry his daughter, can he? Haha.” Yes. Haha. Silly incest.

And in the corner of my mind where my common sense naps contentedly, I hear a faint alarm, a bell of warning, a dim gong gonging to rouse that sleeping part of me, but it snoozes on, dreaming of Christmas bells and pie. “Ask not for whom the bell tolls, Tee Tee.”

Meanwhile back in our looming Greek tragedy, the princess begs and begs her father to forget the idea, but he will not be swayed because he is a hideous perv. The Lilac Fairy, her godmother naturally, comes up with an idea to buy some time.

“Tell him to get you a dress the color of the weather before you give him an answer.”

He does so.

“Ask for a dress the color of the moon.”

She gets one.

“Uh, now …. demand a dress the color of the sun.”

And, voila, new dress.

So while the royal wardrobe grows bigger and bigger, I just keep reading because, well, I’m in it now, aren’t I? Fairy-tale incest is imminent, Piper’s eyes are bulging, and I’m determined to make them look normal again somehow. I mean, I can’t send her back to my sister looking like this. Like Tee Tee’s is a house of horrors that turns little girls into Marty Feldman, even though that’s exactly what it is at the moment. But it’s gonna be better. Somehow. The sun’ll come out tomorrow, I’m sure. If I just keep reading. Betcher bottom doll … ar

The princess, even with all her gorgeous new duds, is frantic. Her pervy father will not relent because he is such a big fat perv. So The Lilac Fairy — no real genius so far, frankly — offers another idea.

“Now we must ask him something really hard. Demand the skin of his dear famous donkey who gives him all his gold.”

And here is where my plan — my ill-advised but well-intentioned plan — to de-bulge my niece’s eyes goes terribly horribly awry.

“The king thought it a queer wish but he did not hesitate. The donkey was killed and its skin brought to the unhappy princess.”

Holy animal abuse, Batman!

I glance down at my future no-fur designer and watch her whole face scrunch up, harginger of an approaching storm of tears. Oh, no. No. Make it go away, Tee Tee. Make it go away now. In that sleepy corner of my mind, the dim gong gongs louder and common sense rouses for a moment. I look down at her face and hear myself say — finally — “Uhm, sweetie, do you want to stop the story now?”

From deep in the furrow of her face comes a shaky, “No, Tee Tee. I want to hear how it ends.”

You know, this is so great. Singlehandedly, I have created the perfect nighty-nite moment for a 7-year-old girl: Fairy-tale incest, animal fur used as clothing, imminent tears. Just the ingredients necessary for a deep sleep full of nothing but sweet dreams.

I am reminded how much I loathe myself.

Maybe I can mitigate the damages with some saucy, age-appropriate banter, I think, but I am discombobbled by yellow haze and snoozy judgment and bad timing and the whole venture falls completely flat, like this:

“Pipey, wouldn’t it be cool if instead leaving piles of dog poo in the backyard, Hawkeye left piles of gold? That would be kinda neat, huh?”

“But Tee Tee, if it came from his bottom, I don’t think I’d like that very much.”

Good point. Shut up, Tee Tee, for the love of God. Just finish the whole squalid tale.

It basically goes like this: The Lilac Fairly urges the princess to leave, wrapped in the donkey skin. “All your dresses will follow you underground in a trunk.” (Of course. That’s where all my gowns are.) “Tap this wand when you want them.” So the princess wanders aimlessly, filthy in her donkey skin, until she finds a job cleaning pigsties. She works hard and lives in a hovel on the farm. One day, she passes a pond, sees her reflection and is disgusted at the sight. Back in her hut, she taps the wand and is immediately splendid again in her weather-colored dress. Just then, a handsome nosy prince happens by the farm. He passes the rickety shack, stares through the keyhole — as anyone would do in this situation — and falls immediately in love. He goes home and becomes lovesick and bedridden over the vision of Donkeyskin. “Mother,” he croaks, “have Donkeyskin make me a cake. Maybe that will help.” (Smart lad. Cake helps everything.) The cake is made, but, oops, a tiny delicate ring is left behind in the cake. Prince almost chokes on the thing. “Send for all the women in the kingdom!” (This sounds … familiar …) Donkeyskin shows up, hiding her glory under the grungy skin. She’s teased at court until the ring …. ta da! … fits perfectly. With a shake of her lovely shoulders, the donkey skin slips off and the princess is resplendent again in a sun-colored dress. The prince falls to his knees and begs her to marry him. At the wedding, Donkeyskin’s father arrives with a new “sensible” wife, having been forced, I guess, to choose from the dregs of society left to him after his daughter’s departure. Still, he’s delighted to find his daughter alive, gives her his blessing, and everyone is happy, happy, happy!

Phew. Dodged that fairy-tale incest bullet. Let’s never speak of it again.

“I’m glad the king didn’t marry his daughter, Tee Tee,” comes the somber little voice.

Drat.

“Yeah, me too.”

Then she brightens and changes the subject.

“Know what, Tee Tee? I think those dresses sounded really beautiful.”

And a 7-year-old saves the day.

“Yeah, me too, sweetie.”

Thank God for the resilience of kids because, frankly, I’m totally traumatized.

gossamer girl, red

I’m working on a little series — or I seem to be, anyway — of what I’m now calling “gossamer girls.” They’re kind of light, see-through, floaty, and they make me happy to work on, which I desperately need these days.

This was the first one using the idea.

These are all 8″ x 10″ and when I scan them, I have to shrink ’em down, so the background on this one looks a bit pixelated. The texture you see on the dress is really there, but the background is a little pixelated. Is that even the word I mean? Ach, who knows? The hair scanned a little “hotter” than it is in person, but there you have it. I’ll get better at scanning these. One hopes.

This is paper, acrylic, watercolor, and clay.

sc003c3047.jpg

“blog buddies”

I’m under the weather and I know myself well enough to know that I should never blog when I’m under the weather because everything is feverish and naked and buzzing too close to the surface.

The fact that I know this about myself never seems to stop me, however.

So.

I’ve been thinking about this post for a couple of weeks now and figured I’d plan it out and think it through, but it’s wanting to be written right now, it seems. It’s the thing that keeps buzzing like a fly near the surface of my thoughts, banging around for an exit.

I have questions, I do, about this thing called blogging. A horrible, ugly word, really, but that’s neither here nor there. I have questions about blog relationships, is what it is. I’m realizing I have expectations about blog relationships or “blog buddies.” And by “blog buddies” I mean people who regularly read one’s blog or people who read each other’s blogs or have each other on their blogrolls. I’m venturing into dicey territory here, I know, which is why this post hasn’t been written sooner and likely why I’m writing it now when I’m achy and cloudy and lack all common sense.

There’s a trend on my blog that’s really starting to disturb me and I’m becoming wary and listless about the blog because of it. It’s a trend of “blog buddies” saying something offensive or hurtful in the comments, getting a response from me, and then disappearing forever — I can only assume — in anger. In two recent incidents, the blog buddies, rather than apologizing for their condescending comments, disappeared forever AND immediately deleted me from their blogrolls, a kind of passive-aggression I detest and that I had — coincidentally — talked about in a recent post because the same thing had happened before, oh, about a year ago. In the most recent incident, I actually received emails critical of the offending comment but never heard again from that particular “blog buddy.”

(Allow me to interject here: I am not talking about anyone who is currently reading this blog or this post. I’ve monitored my stats carefully and I just know, okay? If you are wondering if it’s you, IT’S NOT. If these people happen to catch this post — very unlikely — they will know it’s them. Please believe me on this. If you have to wonder if it’s you, please know that IT’S NOT.)

Now I understand — sorta — if the (former) blog buddies didn’t care for the way I responded. Maybe I was too blunt or something. I’m always willing to consider that I could handle these things better. But I don’t understand not saying something. I don’t get that at all. If they were upset at how I said what I said or that I said anything at all, you know, okay. Say so. But say so in the context of addressing the comment that set the ball in motion. Their comment. Basically, they went away and banished me from their blogroll as — what? A punishment for addressing their offensive comment?

Now here’s a thing about me: I HATE unresolved issues. HATE them. I will do whatever I feel is in my power to work things out with someone, to try to come to some closure, clarity, whatever you want to call it. But I honestly don’t know how to deal with people who want to be passive-aggressive like this. I don’t want to run after them and hound them to work it out. Believe it or not, I have limits on how pathetic I’m willing to appear. Nonetheless, I’ve tried to reach out to them by still leaving comments on their blogs, etc., but it boils down to this for me: By doing what they did, it shows me something about them. It shows me they can’t or won’t work things out and I can’t possibly make them. It shows me a kind of black-and-white thinking. A certain rigidity that doesn’t bode well for reconciliation.

And I take things like this too much to heart. I’m probably too sensitive. That’s good sometimes and bad most of the time. I know that about myself. But this last incident has hit me hard, I suppose, because of how I initially perceived this person. It’s easy, isn’t it, to assume whatever we want to assume about the faceless people here in cyberspace? Assume goodness. Assume maturity. Assume compassion. Assume — haha — that they are the same as you, would do the same as you.

And it’s also easy, if we read a blog and like what we read, to assume that’s the totality of the person being revealed to us — even though intellectually, on some level, we know that can’t be true. We can’t possibly be seeing the entire person. But maybe we so want to connect that we make people over in our own image. They’re not in front of us in the nitty-gritty of face-to-face interaction, so perhaps we unconsciously sand off the rough spots until the person is polished and smooth and just the way we want them: basically one-dimensional. It’s weird, isn’t it, because it’s almost a kind of well-meaning thievery. In nicely smoothing out the edges, we rob a person’s humanity. And if we’ve imputed only the best of qualities to our blog buddies and politely pilfered their humanity, when an unpleasant moment arises, an offense occurs, it’s a lot easier to walk away. We’re suddenly shocked to discover a crack in the surface we created, so we verbally blast them or leave or both. “Hmph. That person isn’t who I thought. I’m outta here. Hmph.” There are real people on the other side of these screens, but are we only happy to connect with the real people on the other side of these screens until they stop being nice and manageable and exactly how we imagine them to be? Is it just boo-bye, then, I guess? Suddenly simple to write off a bunch of words on a screen when you’ve been friendly with the person behind those words for a couple of years?

I think what I’m wondering here is this: How do we navigate through these cyber relationships? How do we remember — and treat — each person as if we’re always mindful of their humanity? That they have strengths and weaknesses at the same time? How do we handle conflict with blog buddies? What do we expect of them? What do they expect of us? What do you expect of me?

I want to say this to all of you: If ever I offend or hurt or anger you, I really would like to be told — as nicely as you possibly can. Because if we were friends in a face-to-face way, I’d want that. The health of the relationship would demand it, I think. I’m asking you here and now to please say something. I’d rather my blog buddies never stomp off this blog, but, again, I can’t necessarily stop that. As recent history has proven. Maybe I need to change the way I handle these incidents. Actually, I’m sure that’s true. I’m sure I need to think about that more.

Conflicts arise; we’re only human. So how do we allow each other to be human, embrace the humanity that really does exist in this cyber world, when it’s just so much easier to make it all disappear with the click of a mouse?

hero

This sailor will be awarded the Medal of Honor posthumously in a ceremony on April 8. He’s buried at Fort Rosecrans here in San Diego across the bay from SEAL headquarters on Coronado Island.

I think I want to go visit him and pay my respects.

Amazing story of a true hero.

monsoor.jpg
Thank you for your service and your sacrifice, Michael Monsoor.