i can hear the frenzied screams from here

Did I mention Comic-Con is in town? Oh, yes. I’m now afraid to walk the streets lest I be assaulted by a “Klingon” violently demanding my purse from me in, uhm, “Klingon.”

Oh, and Sarahk? When I emailed you the other night during the local 11:00 news to give you the status on Kristen Stewart’s hair — you know, because oh, how I love you — I wasn’t entirely accurate. It looked a lot shorter in the news report than it actually is. Still, the girl is totally Goth-ing out. And, as a withered crone, I don’t even know what that means. I just report. Or, alternatively, make things up. Potato/potahto.

Here she is for you, Sarahk. Oh, and there are some random dudes in this photo too. Must be fans or something. I guess. Who knows? I sure don’t.

twilightnewmoon.jpg
(I do like her tennis shoes.)

hello, sarahk

Sarahk, you know I love you. Oh, how I love you. So I feel I must share something with you.

Something I won’t be doing for you even though I love you, oh, how I love you, blahdie blahdie blah.

I won’t, repeat WON’T, be going down to International Comic-Con 2009 — a mere, oh, five miles from me at the San Diego Convention Center — to see all the stars of Twilight: New Moon who are in town for a “panel discussion” and a screening of said movie.

Nope.

Can’t do it. The crowds, the fan boys, the costumes, they skeer me. They give me the bends and gout and cause me palpitations and kidney failure. It’s true. I’m all about truth here, as we all know. I’m a withered crone and cannot be expected to be out in that environment. I mean, if some fan boy brushed up against my brittle bones, I could turn to dust in an instant. It could be poof! no more Tracey and you wouldn’t want that, would you?

Would you?

Oh, plus — bummer — it’s all sold out and probably has been since 1573. So boo hoo hoo on that.

But, really, I still love you, Sarahk, despite all this damning evidence to the contrary.

Here’s what I will do: I will call my friend M who is a concierge at a shi-shi poo-poo hotel in la-di-dah La Jolla and see if she’s seen any Twilight celebrities, okay? She always tells me who she sees: Drunken NFL players. Marlon Brando demanding Mexican food. You know, your basic ho-hum stuff.

That I will do for you.

Honestly, Sarahk, I don’t know how much more sacrificial my love for you could be.

is this wrong?

I need to know. Seriously.

I need to know if it’s wrong to think some of the clothes on this site for Islamic clothing are really pretty.

Like this tunic:

tunic.jpg

Or this one:

tunic3.jpg

I mean, wouldn’t they look cute with jeans?

I’m scaring myself.

But look — all their pants are like sailor pants:

pants.jpg

And everyone knows sailor pants look good on all of us dhimmis.

I’m scaring myself.

Okay. So I drank some wine and I have a low tolerance for alcohol.

Fine.

I also worked out on my trampoline for 45 minutes with 5-pound weights on each arm so I was lightheaded anyway and it seemed like a good idea to me, apparently, to add alcohol to the mix.

Whatevs. I’m not Solomon. This is not news.

Plus, it’s nighttime and it’s still 953 degrees here.

I’m just saying there are extenuating circumstances here that are to blame for this post.

Proceed apace, dhimmis.

let’s pretend

Let’s pretend you’re a woman. Some of you won’t need to pretend here. Let’s pretend you’re a blonde. See second sentence above. Let’s pretend you have an in-law who only emails you to send you dumb blonde jokes. Let’s also pretend there is never a hello, how are you, or what’s going on with you included in these dumb blonde joke emails. And let’s pretend you think you generally have a really good sense of humor, but let’s also pretend that you find these emails — again, the only communication you ever receive from this person — uhm, annoying and a teeny bit offensive.

So in this completely pretend scenario, are you, the blonde woman, overreacting? Are you hyper-sensitive? Do you just need to, uhm, spark a doobie and chillax or get drunk on mulberry wine?

Because, you know, I think about these totally random scenarios that have nothing whatsoever to do with me or anyone I know.

It’s all part of my generalized mania.

Thank you for your input on this entirely hypothetical situation.

inbox

Dear Tee Tee and uncle (Beloved),

I had a great time with you. I liked watching Heidi and Bedtimes Story with you too. I also liked playing WIG OUT! with you two. I liked going to the beach and I liked doing everthing with you. THANK YOU!
love,
Piper

She typed it herself.

That kid. She just makes me blaze with love.

shopping for the sudden yurt commune

So, yes, tonight, I’m window shopping for additions to our Sudden Yurt Commune and I cannot believe what I just found. So so gorgeous.

Now, I know we’re all about yurts. I still LOVES me the yurt: I want a yurt, I need a yurt, and I even recently considered a missions trip to Mongolia — I kid you not — until I realized I was thinking more of all the beautiful yurts I would stay in than how I might, you know, serve our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. So, yeah, that didn’t work out. Jesus was none too pleased, I guess, which is weird. I mean, you’d think he’d like yurts.

So I’m here, stateside — not in Mongolia, flopped in a yurt, throwing up yak’s milk. Fine. Whatever. You adjust. You deal with disappointment. You move on. (I said you do; I myself do not.)

Oh, and you also shop for additions to your Sudden Yurt Commune and stumble upon a new type of shelter for your little piece of collective heaven. Not a replacement of the yurt, no, never, but a supplement to the bliss, an enhancement to the joy.

Oh, look. Just look.

Gorgeous, refurbished gypsy caravans.

gypsycaravan2.jpg
Morning caravans

gypsycaravan12.jpg
Moonlight caravans ….. ablaze and magical

gypsycaravan3a.jpg
Some interiors

gypsycaravan3b.jpg

gypsycaravan5a.jpg

gypsycaravan5b.jpg
(All caravans from designer Jeane Bayol.)

Can you see it? A few of these for our commune? Along with our yurts.

And our hippie motorhome.

And our flagship.

You know, actually, they seem like they could be conjugal visit caravans.

I’m sorry. I didn’t just say that. No, really, I didn’t. Go have your conjugal visits out in the woods, you naughty little beatniks.

Because these would be for reading books from our book swap! Or having tea and nibbling blueberry scones baked by Jayne, our beloved chef and slave! Or extra space for sleeping off our mulberry wine hangovers!

Or, well, whatever suggestions you might have, you shiftless vagrants.

But aren’t they fabulous?

Gypsy caravans for The Sudden Yurt Commune!!

disappointing

You know, the kind of thing that happened in the comment thread of this post is one of disappointing things — one of the down sides — of Internet community. Someone leaves a comment, gets questioned about the comment, responds defensively or cryptically or, in this case, both, and later decides he or she is being attacked and disappears into the ether — for good, one assumes.

It frustrates me. A lot. I asked said commenter no less than four times to please elaborate, please explain, I’m trying to understand you, but, no, she wouldn’t ultimately do it. I read and re-read what I said to her and asked myself if I was rude to her. I could have reworded things — I know I could have — but that’s the same ol’ saw for me, something I always beat myself up about. I guess I’m frustrated because, while on the surface of her initial comment there was kind of sympathy, sort of compassion, it seemed like it was mostly extended to those poor cows — actual cows — who can’t have babies.

I myself do not have compassion for childless cows. My compassion on this issue is reserved for humans only, creatures who can feel and understand loss. But maybe that’s just me. I’m heartless that way.

Interlaced into her comment, though, was a kind of creeping prejudice towards the childless-by-choice contingent. Not as blatant, perhaps, as Dennis Rainey’s, but nascent, cut from the same cloth, and it was that which I felt I should question.

I’m not trying to throw this particular commenter under the bus; it’s just the most recent example of commenters who don’t check their tone or who say careless things they’re ultimately not willing to apologize for or defend, as the case may be. I realize it’s hard. It’s hard always to know how we come across because it’s nearly impossible to be objective about ourselves. But perhaps a good clue is if you’re told repeatedly that your comments come across as negative or snarky or gloomy — or whatever — you might want to edit yourself, double-check a comment before you click submit. And if you’re asked, by more than one person, to clarify what you said, perhaps you weren’t clear to begin with or perhaps there’s an idea you left unfinished, something more to explore.

But don’t go running off. I realize it’s the Internet and nothing is easier than running off in a huff or tail between your legs, but that’s unfortunate. To be completely honest, I don’t respect that because behind all the words and comments you see on a blog are REAL flesh-and-blood people. People who, yes, do get hurt and frustrated by words on the screen. People who are left hanging if someone hurls accusations and then disappears. Life is hard enough, isn’t it, without recreating high school in the Internet? Let’s be the adults that we are. Answer questions. Be courteous. Follow through. Engage in civil debate/discussion.

A personal rule of thumb I try to follow: If I wouldn’t say it to a person’s face, I don’t say it on the Internet. It’s a simple rule, but, still, the invisibility and anonymity of the Internet make baser interpersonal instincts so much easier to indulge. We have to fight it and I include myself in that. Obviously.

On another note: If you ever feel offended by something in the comments, something someone else says, honestly, I feel it’s their responsibility to manage that. Fortunately, that very rarely happens. Nonetheless, I don’t take ownership of comments I didn’t make. I have enough problems with my own mouth to worry about monitoring others, so please don’t expect me to apologize for that which I did not say. If comments ever get too ugly — that hasn’t happened so far, to the best of my knowledge — I’ll step in or shut them down or something, but we’re all adults here so I leave self-discipline to the individual selves who participate in this blog.

Life’s hard. Even harder right now for so many.

So let’s be kind. Practice it ourselves and encourage and applaud it when we see it in others.

Luckily, I’ve just fallen off my soapbox. Ahem.

the strikes against: strike five

I’ve gotten off the track here, what with taking care of The Banshees and a visit from Piper.

But here’s another strike from our Trip to the Resort Up North. I think I can manage to keep with my “no-commentary” policy on this one. Even though I’ve previously blown it, I will try to be strong here.

(The first four are here, here, here, and here.)

So we asked Resort Dude what would our hours be, what the work day would look like, what our days off would be, blahdie blahdie blah — the basics, you know?

He said, “Oh. Uhm. Well. It’s certainly not a traditional work week.”

We said, “Meaning?”

“Well. Okay. Uhm. Well, it’s basically seven days a week.”

“Oh.”

“Weekends are very busy.”

“Oh.”

“But the beginning of the week is slow.”

“Oh.

“So you get a little bit of time to breathe.”

“Oh,” we said. “And are there set hours?”

“Uhm. Well. It’s like maybe 10 or 12 hours a day.”

“Oh.”

“Sometimes more.”

“Oh.”

“But in the winter, it’s really slow. You’d have, like, a month off.”

“Oh.”