Continuing my chapter excerpt from The Jesus I Never Knew:
Christmas art depicts Jesus’ family as icons stamped in gold foil, with a calm Mary receiving the tidings of the Annunciation as a kind of benediction. But that is not at all how Luke tells the story. Mary was “greatly troubled” and “afraid” at the angel’s appearance, and when the angel pronounced the sublime words about the Son of the Most High whose kingdom will never end, Mary had something far more mundane on her mind: But I’m a virgin!
Once, a young unmarried lawyer named Cynthia bravely stood before my church in Chicago and told of a sin we already knew about: we had seen her hyperactive son running up and down the aisles every Sunday. Cynthia had taken the lonely road of bearing an illegitimate child and caring for him after his father decided to skip town. Cynthia’s sin was no worse than many others, and yet, as she told us, it had such conspicuous consequences. She could not hide the result of that single act of passion, sticking out as it did from her abdomen for months until a child emerged to change every hour of every day of the rest of her life. No wonder the Jewish teenager Mary felt greatly troubled: she faced the same prospects even without the act of passion.
In the modern United States, where each year a million teenage girls get pregnant out of wedlock, Mary’s predicament has undoubtedly lost some of its force, but in a closely knit Jewish community in the first century, the news an angel brought could not have been entirely welcome. The law regarded a betrothed woman who became pregnant as an adulteress, subject to death by stoning.
Matthew tells of Joseph magnanimously agreeing to divorce Mary in private rather than press charges, until an angel shows up to correct his perception of betrayal. Luke tells of a tremulous Mary hurrying off to the one person who could possibly understand what she was going through: her relative Elizabeth, who miraculously got pregnant in old age after another angelic annunciation. Elizabeth believes Mary and shares her joy, and yet the scene poignantly highlights the contrast between the two women: the whole countryside is talking about Elizabeth’s healed womb even as Mary must hide the shame of her own miracle.
In a few months, the birth of John the Baptist took place amid great fanfare, complete with midwives, doting relatives, and the traditional village chorus celebrating the birth of a Jewish male. Six months later, Jesus was born far from home, with no midwife, extended family or village chorus present. A male head of household would have sufficed for the Roman census; did Joseph drag his pregnant wife along to Bethlehem in order to spare her the ignominy of childbirth in her home village?
C.S. Lewis has written about God’s plan, “The whole thing narrows and narrows, until at last it comes down to a little point, small as the point of a spear — a Jewish girl at her prayers,” Today as I read the accounts of Jesus’ birth, I tremble to think of the fate of the world resting of the responses of two rural teenagers. How many times did Mary review the angel’s words as she felt the Son of God kicking against the walls of her uterus? How many times did Joseph second-guess his own encounter with an angel — just a dream? — as he endured the hot shame of living among villagers who could plainly see the changing shape of his fiancee?
We know nothing of Jesus’ grandparents. What must they have felt? Did they respond like so many parents of unmarried teenagers today, with an outburst of moral fury and then a period of sullen silence until at last the bright-eyed newborn arrives to melt the ice and arrange a fragile family truce? Or did they, like many inner-city grandparents today, graciously offer to take the child under their own roof?
Nine months of awkward explanations, the lingering scent of scandal — it seems God arranged the most humiliating circumstances possible for his entrance, as if to avoid any charge of favoritism. I am impressed that when the Son of God became a human being he played by the rules: small towns do not treat kindly young boys who grow up with questionable paternity.
Malcom Muggeridge observed that in our day, with family planning clinics offering convenient way to correct “mistakes” that might disgrace a family name, “It is, in point of fact, extremely improbable, under existing conditions, that Jesus would have been permitted to be born at all. Mary’s pregnancy, in poor circumstances, and with the father unknown, would have been an obvious case for abortion; and her talk of having conceived as a result of the intervention of the Holy Ghost would have pointed to the need for psychiatric treatment, and made the case for terminating her pregnancy even stronger. Thus, our generation, needing a Savior more, perhaps, than any that has ever existed, would be too humane to allow one to be born.”
The virgin Mary, though, whose parenthood was unplanned, had a different response. She heard the angel out, pondered the repercussions, and replied, “I am the Lord’s servant May it be to me as you have said.” Often a work of God comes with two edges, great joy and great pain, and in that matter-of-fact response Mary embraced both. She was the first person to accept Jesus on his own terms, regardless of the personal cost.
more to come …
Thank you.
I never thought of the circumstance’s of Jesus birth specifically as “humiliating,” but you know, Yancey makes sense there.
Jesus was born under humiliating circumstances, like an illegitimate child. He died under humiliating circumstances, between two common criminals.
And this was the Son of God, who could have come into the world in a way befitting an earthly king – as richer than any earthly king at the time.
I don’t know what else to say but that I’m going to be thinking about this for a while.
I know, ricki, I just love how Yancey does that … you go away from his stuff and feel like a new part of your mind has opened up.
Tracey, thanks for this. As you know from previous comments, I am not a “Christian”, at least in the traditional sense.
I love these insights that make me think about things in new ways…especially religious issues. Yancey does this quite well.
The part that hit home for me was the line about grandparents: “Did they respond like so many parents of unmarried teenagers today, with an outburst of moral fury and then a period of sullen silence until at last the bright-eyed newborn arrives to melt the ice and arrange a fragile family truce? ”
Having been embroiled in one of those “sullen silences” a year ago, I can appreciate a little bit of what that must have felt like. Although times being what they are now, we didn’t so much have to deal with shame, as disappontment. Anyway, I find myself hoping that those grandparents eventually found the same joy in that “bright-eyed newborn” as we have.
I think I will look at both stories in a different, even a better, way now.
That’s…some kind of astonishing.
Is Yancey Philip Yancey who wrote Soul Survivor (which I still need to finish)? (looked it up…yes it is.) That line from C.S. Lewis is perfect. I can’t think of a better way to say it.
I found my way here via Sheila, Rudolph, and evil Santa, for what it’s worth.
I think I have to go get me some Yancey at the bookstore. Thanks for the excerpts Tracey!
Shannon — So glad you liked it. Given what you’ve been through I can certainly see how you’d relate to that.
NF — Yeah. Tell your fiancee; a paperback makes a nice stocking stuffer. 😉