william goldman: “misery,” part 2

More from Goldman’s Which Lie Did I Tell? Scroll down for Part 1.

Casting Kathy Bates

“I’m going to write the part for Kathy Bates.”

“Oh, good. She’s great. We’ll use her.”

I was the first speaker, Rob Reiner the second. And lives changed.

I had seen Kathy Bates for many years on stage. We had never met but I felt then what I do now: she is simply one of the major actresses of our time. I’d seen her good-heartedness in Vanities, where she played a Texas cheerleader. I’d seen the madness when she played the suicidal daughter in ‘Night, Mother. I had no sure sense that the talent would translate — a lot of great stage performers are less than great on film; Gielgud, Julie Harris, Kim Stanley will do as examples — but there is an old boxing expression that goes like this: Bury me with a puncher. And it was a moment in Frankie and Johnny in the Clair de Lune that made me know she was the lady I had to be buried with. She plays a waitress who has a fling with a cook and at one point she is wearing a robe and he wants to see her body.

The scene was staged so that he saw her naked body and the audience saw her face, and there was such panic in her eyes and at the same time, this wondrous hope. (Casting note: when Michelle Pfeiffer, who I think is a brilliant character actress, played the same part in the movie, the same moment was there, but it didn’t work for me because Pfeiffer is so loved by the camera that all I kept thinking was, Why was she worrying when the worst that could happen would be a pubic hair maybe out of place?)

Anyway, Kathy got the part.

It was really almost that simple because Reiner had seen her on Broadway and thought she was as gifted as I did. We could have had almost any actress in the world. Obviously, it’s a decent part — Kathy won the Oscar for it — but the main reason so many women were interested is there is almost nothing for women out there nowadays. Sad but true. Rob had lunch with Bette Midler, who would have been fine and would have helped open the picture. But she did not want to play someone so ugly, and Rob realized she would be wrong for the part. All stars would be wrong for the part, he decided. Annie is the unknown creature who appears alone out of a storm. We know nothing about her. Stars bring history with them, and I believe, in this case, that would have been damaging.

Example: there is a scene where Annie asks Paul to burn his most recent book in manuscript. It is the last thing on earth he wants to do and he says no. They argue but he is firm.

Fine, Annie says, I love you and I would never dream of asking you to do anything you didn’t want to do. Forget it. I never asked. But —

— big but —

— while she is saying forget I ever asked, what she is doing is walking around his bed, flicking lighter fluid onto the sheets. She is threatening, in Annie’s sweet, shy way, to fry him.

Rob and Andy and I talked so much about that scene. Was it enough? Did she have to do more? We decided to go with it. But my feeling is that even with as brilliant a performer as Streep in the part, it would not have worked, because sitting out there in the dark, some part of us would have known that Meryl Streep wasn’t really going to incinerate Jimmy Caan.

But no one knew who Kathy Bates was. And because of that, not to mention her skill, the scene held. One of the advantages to working with an independent — which Castle Rock was in those days — is that they have more freedom in casting. No way Mr. Disney or the Brothers Warner would have us go with an unknown in the lead of what they hope would be a hit movie. And you know what? If I had been the head of a large studio, I wouldn’t have cast her either ….

Next up, Part 3: Casting Jimmy Caan

william goldman: “misery,” part 1

So let’s talk William Goldman, one of my big crush men. Or rather, let’s let him talk. I’m rereading Which Lie Did I Tell? Goldman’s book about his career, writing, Hollywood, gossip, his insecurities, etc., and whenever I reread it — which is frequently — I love it even more than the last time I read it. It’s a follow-up to Adventures in the Screen Trade, his first book on the same subject matter, also great. I just love Goldman’s voice. The way he just chats with you, lays it all out there, like you’re just sitting over a cup of coffee with him. He has a cut-to-the-chase way of writing these stories. Plus, he’s funny. And he’s funny about himself, which is always endearing to me. In the opening chapters, he talks about how some of his screenplays became movies and I’m going to be posting one of those chapters here, in several parts — the chapter on Misery. If you’re familiar with Misery, either through the book or the movie or both, I think you’ll enjoy this.

I’ll be quoting him exactly, using whatever language he uses, so if you’re likely to be offended by his swearing, then this is your chance to click away. Also, if you haven’t ever seen Misery, but might like to someday, click away. A really big spoiler coming up.

Okay. Think I’ve covered all the bases.

Begin the chapter on Misery!

Misery came about like this.

I got a call from Rob Reiner saying he was interested in this book by Stephen King and would I read it. He became interested when Andy Scheinman, Reiner’s producer, read it on a plane and wondered who owned the movie rights. The book had been in print for a while, was a number-one best-selling novel, standard for King.

They found out it hadn’t been sold — not for any lack of offers but because King wouldn’t sell it. He had disliked most of the movies made from his work and didn’t want this one, perhaps his favorite, Hollywooded up. Reiner called him and they talked. Now, one of the movies made from his fiction that King did like was Stand By Me, which Reiner directed. The conversation ended with King saying sure, he would sell it, but he would have to be paid a lot of money and that Reiner would have to either produce or direct it.

Reiner, who had no intention of directing, agreed. He would produce. He called me. I read Misery. I had read enough of King to know this: of all the phee-noms that have appeared in the past decades, King is the stylist. If he ever chooses to leave the world that has made him the most successful writer in memory, he won’t break a sweat. The man can write anything, he is that gifted.

Misery
is about a famous author who has a terrible car crash during a blizzard, is rescued by a nurse. Who turns out to be his number-one fan. Who also turns out to be very crazy. And who keeps him prisoner in her out-of-the-way Colorado home. It all ends badly for them (worse for her). I was having a fine old time reading it. I’m a novelist, too, so I identified with Paul Sheldon, who was not just trapped with a nut, but also trapped by his own fear of losing success. And Annie Wilkes, the nurse/warden, is one of King’s best creations.

When I do an adaptation, I have to be kicked by the source material. One of the ways I work is to read that material again and again. So if I don’t like it a lot going in, that becomes too awful. I wasn’t sure halfway through if I would write the movie, but I was enjoying the hell out of the novel.

Then on page 191 the hobbling scene began.

Paul Sheldon has managed to get out of the bedroom in his wheelchair, and he gets back in time to fool Annie Wilkes. This is more than a little important to him, because Annie is not the kind of lady you want real mad at you.

Except, secretly, she does know, and in the next fifteen pages, takes action.

I remember thinking, What in the world will she do? Annie has a volcanic temper. What’s in her head? She talks to Paul about his behavior and then she eventually works her way around to the Kimberly diamonds mines and asks him how he thinks they treat workers there who steal the merchandise. Paul says, I don’t know, kill them, I suppose. And Annie says, Oh, no, they hobble them.

And then, all for the need of love, she takes a propane torch and an ax and cuts his feet off, says, “Now you’re hobbled,” when the deed is done.

I could not fucking believe it
.

I mean, I knew she wasn’t going to tickle him with a peacock feather, but I never dreamt such behavior was possible. And I knew I had to write the movie. That scene would linger in the audiences’ memories, as I knew it would linger in mine.

The next half year or so is taken up with various versions, and I work with Reiner and Scheinman, the best producer I have ever known for script. We finally have a version they okay and we go director hunting. Our first choice is George Roy Hill, and he says yesss. Nirvana.

Then Hill calls and says he is changing his mind. We all meet. And Hill, who has never in his life done anything like this, explains. “I was up all night. And I just could not hear myself saying ‘Action’ on that scene. I just haven’t got the sensibility to do that scene.”

“What scene?” (I am in agony — I desperately want him to do it. He is tough, acerbic, brilliant, snarly, passionate.)

“The lopping scene.”

What madness is this? What lopping scene?

“The scene where she lops his feet off.”

“George, how can you be so wrong?” (After Butch Cassidy and Waldo Pepper, we have been through a lot together. The only way to survive with George is to give him shit right back.) “That is not a lopping scene, that is a hobbling scene. And it is great and it is the reason I took this movie and she only does it out of love.”

“Goldman, she lops his fucking feet off. And I can’t direct that.”

“It is the best scene in the movie when she hobbles him. It’s a character scene, for God’s sake.”

He would not budge. And, of course, since it was the most important scene and the best scene, it had to stay. A sad, sad farewell. We were about to send the script to Barry Levinson when Rob said, “To hell with it, I’ll direct it myself.”

And so the lopping-scene poll came into my life.

Because Hill has a brilliant movie mind and you must pay attention. Rob had no problem directing the scene. But what if George was right? I, of course, scoffed — the hobbling scene was a character scene, unlike anything yet filmed, and it was great and it was the reason I took the picture and it had to stay.

Still, we asked people. A poll was taken at Castle Rock, informally, on anyone who had read the script. “And what did you think of the lopping scene?” Rob would keep me abreast in New York. “A good day for the hobblers today, three secretaries said leave it alone.” That wasn’t exactly verbatim, but you get the idea.

Enter Warren Beatty. Beatty understands the workings of the town better than anyone. He has been a force for forty years, has been in an amazing number of flops, and whenever his career seems a tad shaky, he produces a wonderful movie or directs a wonderful movie and is safe for another half decade.

Beatty was interested in playing Paul. Rob and Andy met with him a lot and I spent a day there when the lopping scene came up. Beatty’s point was this: he had no trouble losing his feet at the ankles, but know that if you did that the guy would be crippled for life and would be a loser.

I said nonsense …. it was a great scene … a character scene …. was the reason I took the movie … Beatty waffled, casting continued. As did the lopping queries. I went on vacation as we were about to start, and while I was gone, Rob and Andy wanted to take a final pass at the script. I was delighted. They wanted it shorter, tighter, tauter, and are expert editors. When I got back, I read what they had done.

It was shorter, tighter, tauter —

— only the lopping scene was gone, replaced by what you saw in the movie — she breaks his ankles with a sledgehammer.

I scrreeamed.
I got on the phone with Rob and Andy and told them they had ruined the picture, that it was a great and memorable scene they had changed, it was the reason I had taken the job. I was incoherent (they are friends, they expect that) but I made my point. They just wouldn’t buy it. The lopping scene was gone now, forever replaced by the ankle-breaking scene. I hated it but there it was.

I am a wise and experienced hand at this stuff and I know when I am right.

And you know what?

I was wrong. It became instantly clear when we screened the movie. What they had done — it was exactly the same scene except for the punishment act — worked wonderfully and was absolutely horrific enough. If we had gone the way I wanted, it would have been too much. The audience would have hated Annie, and, in time, hated us.

If I had been in charge, Misery would have been this film you might have heard of but never have gone to see. Because people who had seen it would have told you to ride clear. What makes a movie a hit is not the star and not the advertising but the word of mouth. So in the movie business, as in real life, we all need all the help we can get. And we need it every step of the way.

Next up, Part 2: Casting Kathy Bates.

helpful do’s and don’ts i learned this weekend

~ Don’t go to a movie just to avoid an HOA meeting with your half-dozen clinically insane neighbors who call each other “faggot” during these courteous, constructive gatherings.

~ Don’t let the movie be 10, 000 B.C.

~ Well, too late. You’re there now.

~ Do marvel at the perfect accents of the pre-verbal troglodytes with the shiny white teeth.

~ Do wonder why a movie about said troglodytes seems to be narrated by Sigmund Freud.

~ Do, please, sit goggling at how a giant plastic rainforest rises suddenly out of High Sierra sagebrush.

~ Do ask yourself if Clint Eastwood will turn up somewhere in there, wearing a bitchin’ poncho. Cross your fingers and pray for this to happen.

~ Don’t be too shocked when it doesn’t, okay, hon?

~ Do marvel at how the noble and time-travelling woolly mammoth was forced to help build the ancient pyramids.

~ Don’t blame your third grade teacher for not teaching you this.

~ Do laugh at how the mammoths’ stubby tusks — neatly trimmed to keep them from kebabbing their captors — look like cigarettes dangling from both sides of their mouths.

~ Do continue, whenever you see the woolly mammoths, to make frantic two-handed smoking gestures at each other in the dark.

~ Do try to shush yourselves because Silence is Golden, wieners.

~ Do be sure to notice the desert village full of huts that look like this:

sc00021499.jpg

and then wonder if that’s where Hummel figurines come from.

~ Do keep that to yourself.

~ Until now.

~ Oops.

~ Do try to care about any of the characters.

~ Don’t be disappointed when that doesn’t happen, okay, hon?

~ Do try again. Squinch your face up real hard now.

~ All right. Do feel free to give up.

~ Do keep waiting to see bits of roasted leg ‘o’ mammoth stuck between any character’s teeth at any time while trying to see — in the dark — if your tongue is black from Good ‘n’ Plenty.

~ Do wish the giant sabre-toothed tiger was a cool cigarette-toothed tiger instead.

~ Don’t wonder what’s wrong with you, hon; you’re fine. You hear me? You’re fine.

~ Don’t question your maturity level, either. You’re a veritable sage, Betty.

~ And don’t be thinkin’ you’ve got ADD.

~ What?

~ Out of sheer boredom, do work up into a righteous froth when the “god” of this vaguely Egyptian locale is killed and he turns out to be a shriveled old whitey.

~ Do begin to ponder the state of race relations in the 21st century whilst continuing to consume large handfuls of Good ‘n’ Plenty.

~ Do decide that dead shriveled whitey must have been some kind of awesome dentist and that’s why he was their almighty god.

~ Don’t feel guilty about that wave of relief you feel when it’s over. This is all perfectly normal.

~ Do wonder, as you’re leaving, though, if the HOA meeting would have been less boring or more mammoth-free than the movie or if possibly Clint Eastwood showed up at the meeting wearing a bitchin’ poncho.

~ You’ll never know now, will you?

update

I am in despair over how much carbonara I just ate.

Let’s never speak of it again.

anticipation

Our niece Piper is coming to visit us in a couple of weeks. I worked out the details with my sister and, afterwards, she sent an email saying, “Piper is so excited, I had to dissuade her from already packing her suitcase! She said she is happy the time change is this weekend because ‘that means I can spend longer days at Tee Tee and Uncle Beloved’s house.'”

That kid.

et tu, des voeux?

So remember the missing Des Voeux? Of course you do. I’m sure you were all a’twitter about my Des Voeux-induced fretfulness of last night. I’ll bet when you heard my conundrum, you all clutched the sides of your bald heads, covering your ears in horror against the existential angst of it all, whilst simultaneously standing on a bridge against a burnt red sky, much like that guy in “The Scream.” I’ll just bet.

I can picture it now. And it makes me happy. Especially picturing you all bald. Forgive me.

Back to Des Voeux. Yeah. Well, immediately after my angsty attack, I picked up the book again. Three pages later, Des Voeux magically reappeared to utter one measly line as if he’d read my post and willed himself to reappear just to thumb his frostbitten nose at me. If he even still has a nose. Or a thumb.

So okay. Des Voeux and Le Vesconte are not the same person as I fussed about earlier. Okay. So I’m simple-minded; is this really a surprise? So the author didn’t get all senile and lose track of his characters. Okey-doke. So I’m condescending too. Quel dommage. I’m a veritable paella of personal flaws.

You heard me.

But in my defense — defensive, too; the pot overflows — Des Voeux was centerstage 200 pages ago. Well, that’s a stretch; more like upstage right. He was involved in the story. He did his part. He was there when something truly awful happened and I thought maybe he’d have something to say about it. Like, “Bon jour, dudes, comment allez-vous? I’m glad you’re fine, but I totally have PTSD about that monster on the ice, ya dig?” But no. Bupkis. Maybe he was off swabbing for 200 pages, I don’t know. All I know is that he disappeared and didn’t even say goodbye and immediately after that, this shifty Le Vesconte fellow appeared on the scene. Out of nowhere. So deep in the folds of my drunken one a.m. brain, my previous hypothesis made perfect sense: that they were one and the same person and the author had gotten the names mixed up — because of the Frenchiness and V-ness — and his editor had missed it completely. Do you see? Do you? Do vous?

All right, Des Voeux, wander back into the story if you want. Fine with me. Thumb your noseless nose at me with your thumbless thumb just like all those kids on the grade school playground. Swab it up with Le Vesconte just to muddle me even further. That’s fine. Whatevs. Just remember that thing is still out there on the ice, probably watching you right now with its “bottomless black hole eyes.” Watching you as you swab and swab and try to feel your toes again. Bonne chance, Des Voeux.

prettiness

Pretty pretty hair.
vint-hair.jpg

Pretty pretty dead fox accessories and pretty pretty dead lhasa apso hat.
vintlouisecromwell.jpg
Still, does it mean I’m sick and demented if I think she’s a gorgeous babe? That she’s a gorgeous dead-animal-wearin’ babe?

Please don’t tell PETA. Or Saint Francis. And I’m not Catholic, just covering my bases. Or, also, Pam Anderson — don’t tell her. That one scares me the most. So we’re all agreed? Good.

PS: What is the fluffy fox thing in her lap? A purse? A blanket? A stadium seat cushion? Please enlighten. Thank you.

where is des voeux??

So I’m confused by something in the book I’m reading right now. There’s a character named Des Voeux. He’s around for about 165 pages and now …. he’s gone. Two hundred pages later and nary a mention. In his place, there seems to be a character named Le Vesconte. Now, of course, I just think this because they’re two French names and because I don’t think deep thoughts and so two French names are obviously the same person, duh. But where is Des Voeux?? I have to know. I need to know. I need closure. Look, this book is seriously freaking me out in every way. (I saw a review that called it “Patrick O’Brian meets Stephen King.”) That’s a pretty good description, you know, because there’s a thing — a giant white demonic thing — stalking and killing people out on the ice and it’s all so horrifying and why do I read this before I fall asleep? Then — then — the ships are trapped in the ice and everyone’s gonna starve if the thing doesn’t get them first and, still, all I can think about is: Where is Des Voeux?? I know the thing didn’t get him. I know that. He was just there in the story and now he’s not. No explanation. No, “exit, pursued by a bear” which would actually make sense in this story. Nothing. And, honestly, it’s not like I cared about him all that much. I care more about his sudden disappearance from the book than I do about his well-being in the story. Mainly because I don’t want to believe that the author just up and switched names on me. I really don’t want to believe that. There was Des Voeux and now there’s Le Vesconte and maybe I’m just simple-minded enough to think they’re the same person because they’re both French and they both have a capital V. Or …. or … maybe I’m just condescending enough to believe that the poor widdle author is confused and senile and can’t keep his characters straight. And maybe I’m just writing this inane quibbly post because I had to put the book down and decompress and breathe and try not to have a reading-induced anxiety attack.

I’ll bet Des Voeux is just hiding out in the freezing hold of the ship. With all the dead bodies. You know, where it’s safe. That’s probably it. I have another 400 pages or so for him to magically reappear. I’m sure he will.

It’s all gonna be fine.

ai: top 8 men

I see my current mental flakiness has reared its ugly head again. I meant to post this last night, but somehow it just ended up back in thee olde draughts. For what it’s worth, my meager thoughts on last night’s AI. The only two worth commenting on, in my opinion.

So.

80’s night.

David Cook, the dude who did the amazing emo version of Lionel Ritchie’s cheesy 80’s hit “Hello” AND played electric guitar, uhm, yeah; that whole thing totally rocked my world. Brilliant.

Jason Castro singing Leonard Cohen’s “Hallelujah”: Completely unexpected and moving. What a wonderful choice.

Other than that …. the rest of the dudes ….. eh.

Except, may I please …. Danny Noriega? KA-POW! And Chikezie? KA-POWW!

Enough profundity. That is all.