grammy notes

I’m not an every-year Grammy watcher. I frequently watch most of the Grammys, but last night, I watched the entire 3 1/2-hour spectacle. It was Grammy’s 50th birthday, so they really poured it on. This is rather late in the day, now, but it’s the first I could get to posting it.

Highlights, lowlights here, all very rambling and free-form, I warn you!

All right. Some thoughts:

~ I loved how it was almost entirely a music show. Mini concerts springing up everywhere. The emphasis on passing out awards seemed blessedly minimal in comparison. Actually, a lot of awards had already been handed out with winner’s names scrolling across the screen. I liked that. The Grammys, as a show, can be so much better than the Oscars because of the music, the potential for a cool concert vibe. I mean, you get the nominated songs performed at the Oscars, but these are mostly songs that no one gives a rip about. Songs that no one owns or downloads or would even consider buying. They’re good for the specific purpose they fill — creating a mood in a movie — but mostly, who cares about, oh, that song from Disney’s The Rescuers or whatevs. These are not the songs that we live our lives to. The songs at the Grammys are those songs. And last night, THAT was the focus. The show was long, but quite literally pulsed with energy. Very few missteps.

~ First, there were some phenomenal set pieces, changed lightning fast from one to another. Each number seemed like its own individual concert. Each one with its own look and vibe. So impressive.

~ Is it me, or has Tom Hanks switched faces with Bill O’Reilly?? Totally weird. Was he drunk??

~ The Cirque du Soleil tribute to the Beatles. I have no idea, frankly, what it was all about, but it was gorgeous and hypnotic to watch. Meaning schmeaning.

~ That Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus is annoying. No context here. I just had to say it. Sorry, kiddos. Don’t tell Piper.

~ Miss Tina Turner. Day-um. That woman is 68 years old and she still ROCKS the house. Those crazy long legs of hers still strutting around the stage. She did a medley of … oh, memory here … What’s Love Got to Do With It and You’d Better Be Good to Me, I think …. and then Beyonce joined her — trying to keep up — for Proud Mary. I just wanted to shout for joy! Wow. Beyonce’s voice was a bit of a mismatch, I thought, with Tina Turner’s but the girl looks great, always, even though her hair is blonde-ish now — a look I generally don’t like on women of color. But it looks good on Beyonce because she’s so freakin’ beautiful. She wore a very short gold dress and I just love the little bit of meat on her legs. She’s a woman who lets herself be a woman. But it was all about Tina and she just ripped it up. Bravo.

~ Kanye West. Uhm, okay. I’m sorry. Just don’t like the guy. Too much ego. Too much hubris. Came out and sang — something, I don’t know his music — and then it morphed into a song about Mama mama mama. Now I know his mom just died, but I felt that was self-indulgent. Didn’t seem like the appropriate venue for that. The evening isn’t just about Kanye West. Save that kind of thing for one of your own concerts where it’s your stage and your evening exclusively. Or honor her in your acceptance speech, briefly. In that moment, instead of admiring or enjoying a performance, it turned into a moment where we’re reminded of his loss, of his pain. We feel awkward, almost, witnessing that for so long. Totally turned me off. Time and place, dude. Later, when he won whatever award it was that he won (uhm, clearly, if you’re looking for a list of the winners, you’ve come to the wrong place; that wasn’t my focus at ALL!), his speech was just … arrogant. Near the end of it, he talked about Mama. His speech had already been plenty long so the hurry-up music started playing and he groused, “Oh, are you really gonna play the music now?” He went on, talking about wanting to “keep making you proud, Mama” which I think is a fine sentiment, generally. There’s just something in his attitude. A sense of entitlement to everything, perhaps. I don’t know. This is a dozen hours now after the show and I can only replay it in my head here. He kept talking, music kept playing, and he said something like, “It would really show a lot of class to stop the music now.” And they did. Then he made promises to Mama about how great he was going to become. Something like, “I’m gonna be the number one artist in the WORLD.” You know, to a roomful of other wildly talented artists. Maybe a couple of even MORE talented artists, if such a thing is possible, Kanye! Never mind that he went way past his time, showboating, frankly. I guess I just felt like the whole thing wasn’t about Mama; it was about him and he manipulated those producers to make a longer moment. For him. I’m going on about this as a set up for a moment — a moment I LOVED — that comes later.

~ Oh, Carrie Underwood opened the show with “Before He Cheats.” Black jacket. Black hotpants. Sexy black boots. Very Shania Twain. I think I’ve seen that exact outfit on Shania, actually. She sounded GREAT. Really, she did. But I gotta say …. I still have a gripe I had with her during Idol. She’s a bit awkward onstage. Seems uncomfortable with moving her body. She did the whole strut down a centerstage staircase and watched her feet a little too much. Once out on the stage, she kinda halfheartedly did these small, easily executed dance moves. When I watch her sing — I don’t see emotion. She doesn’t use her eyes or face or seem to connect with the lyrics. And, uhm, let’s face it. “Before He Cheats” is a song filled with emotion. Rage, pretty much. With a little insane stalking on the side. I want to see her connect with her songs somehow … someday. She seems, still, like such a good girl. She’s Marie Osmond dressed like Shania Twain and she’s still not sure which she wants to be. And I’m not longing for her to turn into a big ole ho, but she needs acting classes or something. I just want to see her become the full package, you know? Her voice is amazing, really, but her performances always lack emotional conviction. She seems afraid to be sexy. Afraid to truly emote or connect. Okay. Enough. Listen to me: “Oh, Carrie Underwood. If you’d only listen to me, you just might be successful.”

~ The medley of Jerry Lee Lewis, Little Richard, and John Fogerty was a lowlight. For me. Jerry Lee — God bless him! — isn’t up to it anymore; he’s too arthritic for the keyboard aerobics of “Great Balls of Fire.” And John Fogerty by himself is just kind of eh to me. Little Richard is Little Richard. Never any different — except his eyes are higher on his head every time I see him.

~ Brad Paisley and his “check you for ticks” song. The whole thing is deeply appalling to me. I think it’s supposed to be clever — and I guess that would really sweep some women off their tick-infested feet. Me, I prefer not to think about ticks ever. Or think about looking for ticks. Or someone looking for them on me. Like that’s our first date. And yes, I suppose it’s all metaphorical, but surely there are a lot better metaphors for that which don’t involve me being the scroungy little mutt of the scenario. I’ve heard the song on the radio — never the whole song, because of the hate — but watching it last night with the flashing neon ticks behind him was — literally — stomach-lurching to me.

~ Oh, the moment that came back on Kanye. Just a bit. Vince Gill won an award, that big huggy bear of country music. (And may I now confess my longtime girl crush on his wife, Amy Grant? I think she is adorable and I love her soft accent and I want to be her best friend. In a non-forced, non-felonious way, of course.) Gill’s award was presented by Ringo Starr (and someone else I … sorry, don’t remember) and when Gill accepted it, he turned to where Kanye was sitting in the audience and said, good-naturedly, not snottily, “I just got handed an award from a Beatle; have you had that happen to you yet, Kanye?” Hahahahahaha. To his credit, when the camera was on him, Kanye did laugh.

~ Two huge highlights for me. First one: Amy Winehouse. The girl is a trainwreck, but she is an original. When I first heard “Rehab,” I thought the singer was probably black. (Is that racist??) Oh, well. It’s that her voice and her face are a complete mismatch. The combo just takes you aback. Sheila’s talked about this. And saying “trainwreck” about her, I admit, is certainly not original. Everything I read about her uses that word. Last night, everyone was kept waiting, waiting, for the via satellite performance from Winehouse. When it finally came, late in the show, she did not disappoint. Totally worth the wait to me. She seems like a throwback to Motown. With her backup singers/dancers — a few very awesome black dudes. Loved them. But her face. You can’t look away. Sometimes she looks very Princess Diana deer-in-the-headlights and sometimes she just brazenly stares the audience down. It’s all very schizo. She’s got these bony bird legs and moves kind of awkwardly, as if someone’s holding a gun to her back, but it works. It totally works. And then there’s that voice, the whole sound. Retro with a knife. I don’t know how else to say it, really. And when she won — one of her many awards — they switched back over to the satellite feed and the look on her face. It was heartbreaking, almost. She looked genuinely surprised. No, incredulous. She looked like a little girl in that moment. Her mom came up, crushed her in a hug. She finally found her voice to say some thank you’s. My favorite bit of it went to “my Blake, incarcerated.” Her husband. She was weird and real and vulnerable and powerful, all at once.

~ Highlight No. 2, my favorite moment. “Rhapsody in Blue” with Herbie Hancock playing dueling grand pianos with an Asian fellow — a true virtuoso — whose name escapes me. (Someone help me out on that, please.) Herbie Hancock played with a grin on his face the whole time. The other fellow was more straight-faced, more showy. He worked that piano with great dramatic flourish and focus, but there was a bit of a “watch me play” vibe. He was tremendous, no doubt, but their approaches, such contrast …. like I was witnessing the joy of the artist and the ego of the artist played out in front of me, embodied in two totally different men. That’s just my gut response to what I saw. The solo clarinetist was a gem. A pure joy. His facial expressions — priceless! He acted. He emoted. He played those wonderful sinuous passages as if he were telling the audience a sly secret joke. I loved watching how much HE loved what he was doing. The conductor, too. Surrounded by sound, orchestra in front of him, pianists behind him, no baton — that I could see, at least — just his hands. He whirled about furiously, orchestra, pianists, back again, a crazy smile on his face. Halfway through the piece — which is one of my favorites — I had tears streaming down my cheeks. It was the music, yes, but beyond that, it was the JOY of Herbie Hancock, the clarinetist, the conductor. It was the selfless JOY of their art, their gifts, and the freedom to show it that just stuck in my throat. A truly transcendent moment. The audience was on its feet. I clapped too. I did. I literally applauded in my living room when it was done.

All right. Phew. Believe it or not, I really intended a few brief comments. Got away from me just a wee bit there.

damn

R.I.P. Roy Scheider.
allthatjazz.jpg
Jaws always seemed to eclipse your career. But I remember you for this. I remember you for Joe Gideon. Thank you, Mr. Scheider.

cartoon skeletons

Oh, pippa. Really. I beseech you. You must go immediately to this page on the site of Portland-based artist Michael Paulus. He’s done a whole series of skeletons of popular cartoon figures and it will positively fill you with joy, I guarantee it. I’m beside myself! Much like these cartoons! Look at Charlie Brown:

charliebrownskeleton.jpg
Hahahahahaha! I feel like I’ve died and gone to a heaven where there is nothing but giggling, giggling, for all eternity.

Here’s part of what he writes about his series:

I decided to take a select few of these popular characters and render their skeletal systems as I imagine they might resemble if one truly had eye sockets half the size of its head, or fingerless-hands, or feet comprising 60% of its body mass.

Trust me, Mr. Paulus, My Beloved is not threatened, but I feel I must tell you that I am deeply in love with you right now. I basically have no words for how happy this all makes me.

I’m serious when I say you cannot click away FAST enough to check out these pieces: Hello, Kitty. Peppermint Patty. Betty Boop. Pikachu. And on and on. And much bigger images than I was able to reproduce here. GO! GO! GO! I want all of you to feel the utter GLEE I’m feeling right now!

(Oh, wait! One last thing! Be sure to scroll down after his explanation and note the link to “Mrs. Duncan’s class assignment.” Click on that AFTER you’ve looked at all of his stuff. A bunch of middle school kids did this very same thing as an assignment in science class and their pieces are hilarious. I cannot get past the “skeletal system” of “Chip” from “Beauty and the Beast”! The base of the teacup has phalanges! And the letters from the students about their projects! This from teacup kid: “It was hard to adapt your skill and technique to my character because cups don’t have bones.” I’m crying with laughter!!)

snippets

ME: Hey, guess what? Tuesday is Museum Month!

HE:

(I really shouldn’t talk for at least an hour after I wake.)

***********

ME: I have a plan.

HE: Uh-oh.

ME: “Uh-oh”? What “uh-oh”?

HE: Nothing, really.

ME: Well, something.

HE: No, tell me. I wanna hear it.

ME: Well, you can’t just un-uh-oh.

commercial I love

“Hey, Jane. I baked you a cake to represent our love. It’s burnt, but that’s just because you’re a hottie from Hottingham.”

For AT&T cellphones or something. I love that little dork, slathering impossibly pink frosting on that charred and lumpen cake. Hahahahaha.

book meme

Sheila tagged me with this, oh, about 87 years ago. So even though, in the vast yawn of time since then, I have become a bony withered crone and MB’s entire body has become scrotum; even though we tell each other to rage, rage, against the dying of the light; still, we persevere and faithfully do me-me’s with what’s left of our wits.

Which book do you irrationally cringe away from reading, despite seeing only positive reviews?

Oh, what’s that one? The Ya-Ya Jumpy Girls? That one. Wait. I have to Google the actual name. Okay. Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood. I actually don’t know if it got good reviews — literary reviews — I just know that for a while there, it seemed like every woman I know or didn’t know or didn’t want to know kept gushing about this book. “Ohhh …. you gotta read the Ya-Ya Sisterhood! You just have to!” Uhm, no, thank you. I don’t even care what it’s about. It’s the title and the vibe I get from it. I couldn’t carry a book around with that cloying title and still respect myself. Frankly, I’m afraid of the braidable armpit hair I would instantly sprout just from touching it. I’m terrified that reading even one little word would transport me immediately to a parallel universe where I’m a womyn’s studies professor in kooky toe socks and Birkenstocks. No. Gross. Get away, ya-ya jumpy girls! If that means I’m out of the sisterhood, so be it.

If you could bring three characters to life for a social event (afternoon tea, a night of clubbing, perhaps a world cruise), who would they be and what would the event be?

Is this about them interacting with each other or am I involved in the event, too? I guess I can choose whatever I want here, right? Why is this one hard for me, suddenly? Well, let’s start with Jean Valjean because, well, I love him. I experienced him relatively young — 14? — and so he lingers in my heart even how. Mr. Rochester, Jane Eyre, gotta say him. And into our nice little tea — because I just decided it would be a nice little tea — I’ll throw Sugar from The Crimson Petal and the White, the literate prostitute and closet writer with the golden-orange hair and the peeling tree bark skin condition All the uptight Victorian men go crazy for her — for her oddball beauty and her mad skillz, both conversationally and otherwise. Let’s introduce her to Jean Valjean and Mr. Rochester! And because I can be very shy when I feel intimidated — which I do, a little bit, by each of these characters — I’d be a fly on the wall or watch on hidden camera or something slightly less stalker sounding. And I’m not trying to dupe Valjean or Mr. Rochester by throwing in Sugar; I suspect they might not even know her profession. She is well-educated (self) and is lithe and elegant; she looks like a proper lady. Or at least she can. And she’d be wearing lovely gloves to cover her intricately cracked, but graceful, hands. There’d be interesting conversation if her profession isn’t revealed. Maybe more interesting conversation if it is.

(Borrowing shamelessly from the Thursday Next series by Jasper Fforde): you are told you can’t die until you read the most boring novel on the planet. While this immortality is great for awhile, eventually you realise it’s past time to die. Which book would you expect to get you a nice grave?

Oh, no contest. The Bridges of Madison County. A truly deadly book but a great movie, thanks to Clint Eastwood and Meryl Streep and editing that rightly mutilated the dialog past recognition. “I’M the last cowboy!” SHUT UP. If I die, I’m taking you with me, asswipe.

Come on, we’ve all been there. Which book have you pretended, or at least hinted, that you’ve read, when in fact you’ve been nowhere near it?

War and Peace.

As an addition to the last question, has there been a book that you really thought you had read, only to realise when you read a review about it/go to ‘reread’ it that you haven’t? Which book?

Can’t think of one, really.

You’re interviewing for the post of Official Book Advisor to some VIP (who’s not a big reader). What’s the first book you’d recommend and why? (if you feel like you’d have to know the person, go ahead of personalise the VIP)

Let’s see. Someone who’s not a big reader — to get them more interested in reading? Uhm, how about The Princess Bride by my crush man William Goldman? It’s fun, witty, swashbuckling, a fast read. What’s not to love? I think it’s a surefire winner. Unless the person is a total drip.

Oooh, another one ….. To Kill a Mockingbird.

A good fairy comes and grants you one wish: you will have perfect reading comprehension in the foreign language of your choice. Which language do you go with?

Russian — Tolstoy, Dostoevsky
French — mainly to read Les Miserables in the original
Greek — New Testament

A mischievious fairy comes and says that you must choose one book that you will reread once a year for the rest of your life (you can read other books as well). Which book would you pick?

I talk about this book all the time — ALL the dingdang time — but I could, and basically do, read What’s So Amazing About Grace? by Philip Yancey every year. It’s always around somewhere close where I have easy access to it. I can’t think of anyone who’s made the concept of grace more tangible, more accessible to me; who’s taken something that can seem so lofty or dusty or so far removed from modern life and brought it down to earth, pulled the veil back a bit, or just used images that resonate with me, all without robbing grace of its mystery. I feel like Philip Yancey did me a personal favor by writing this book. It’s something I need to hear, over and over. I basically implore everyone to read it.

I know that the book blogging community, and its various challenges, have pushed my reading borders. What’s one bookish thing you ‘discovered’ from book blogging (maybe a new genre, or author, or new appreciation for cover art-anything)?

Well, I read Geek Love on Sheila’s recommendation. And in the end, when you’re done, there are just things you can’t even talk about. The book just shakes you to your core. I feel like anyone who gets through that book — has an appreciation for it, love for it, I don’t even know what to call what you feel about it — is part of this strange Geek Love book club. You become a knower, not a talker. By that I mean, you could meet with the other members of this little club to discuss the book without discussing the book. Without anyone uttering a complete sentence. Someone could simply say, “Geek Love,” and the rest could just nod, knowing, just knowing, what the other person means. There’s so much weight to this book it can’t really be held or named or looked at in the light. It just can’t. You know things you just can’t mention.

That good fairy is back for one final visit. Now, she’s granting you your dream library! Describe it. Is everything leatherbound? Is it full of first edition hardcovers? Pristine trade paperbacks? Perhaps a few favourite authors have inscribed their works? Go ahead-let your imagination run free.

First, I think I’d like the library to be a loft — a nice-sized one, but not too cavernous and overwhelming. I like cozy and big rooms kinda make me uncomfortable. We’re under the eaves, so there’s that coziness. You’re nestled in my library. But you don’t have to heave yourself up a ladder; oh, no, there are stairs that hug the wall leading up to it. The beams are exposed wood, stained a rich color, as is the wood plank floor and the built-in bookshelves. There’s a large area rug on the floor. Maybe Persian? Indian? I need to shop for it still. On one wall, right in the middle of the bookshelves, there’s a fireplace with a crackling fire. The windows look out at some mountains — like ones that loom large in the deep dark middle of nowhere. Two corners under the eaves have huge cushy chairs with ottomans — one corner for me, one for MB, of course. There is a floor lamp in each corner for extra reading light, but — oh, here’s my favorite part! — each corner has a clear skylight above the cushy chair. You can read by natural light during most days. If if rains, you can lean your head back and just watch it patter against the window. If it snows, you watch it pile up in graceful silence. Maybe you fall asleep. Basically, we can sit in our respective corners, read in companionable silence, watch the rain, wave to each other, or still talk; we’re not TOO far away from each other. In the middle of the room, a large wooden table as a desk. Room for two, again. Room for our modest clutter. Room for us both to be writing, drawing, creating, drinking coffee, of course. Oh, and MB has a little cabinet for his cigars and pipes somewhere in our library loft. Another corner has one of those stands that holds quilts — do those have a special name? You know, the kind you see holding quilts in antique stores? Probably “quilt stand,” Tracey. Anyway, we have a variety of blankets hanging from it, always at our disposal, for whenever we want to seriously curl up. And nothing is country-craftsy here. It’s cozy and warm and elegant too. So basically, I might come home in the evening, calling in a mock-snooty voice, “Hullo? Where are you, Beloved?” Then he’d say in the same voice, between puffs on his pipe, “Up here, dahling. In our libary.” And we’d always say libary in private so as not to take ourselves too seriously.

Oh, this was a fun one! A great escape. Thanks, Sheila!

Have at it, anyone, everyone!

I love paper!

Oooh. The first time I saw these paper lampshades from Seattle artist Jil Smith years ago, I wanted one. More precisely, I wanted to learn how to make them myself. Like, right then. Aren’t they cool?

jilsmith.jpg

I still want to learn how to make these …. hm …. hm ….. hmm …..

Anybody know how to make the frames??

political stupidity

I know, redundant, right? No. This post isn’t about politics, per se. It’s about meee and my misadventure at the polling booth today.

MB and I went to vote early this afternoon. We live, as generally conservative people, in an extremely liberal neighborhood. Borderline socialist. Seriously. I would bet money we are the only remotely conservative-leaning people in a 5-mile radius.

The place was empty except for the poll workers. They asked our names, did not ask for ID which really bugs me, and gave us our ballots. Or I should say they gave MB his ballot and he disappeared into the cardboard box, no problem. I, on the other hand, created a hubbub, as is my wont. The lady behind handed me a list and said, “These are the ballots available to you: Independent, Democratic, or Non-Partisan.”

“Excuse me?” I said.

“Well, you’re Non-Partisan.”

“I am?” (And stupid. And stupid people shouldn’t vote.)

Seems at some point — when was this point? — I’d registered as this Non-Partisan thingy.

“Uhm …..” I smartly said.

“So those are your choices of ballots.”

“Just those three?”

“Uh-huh.”

“Not, uh ….” I hesitated to utter the word because I saw her socialist eyes narrowing “….. Republican?”

“No,” she said, sharply.

“Does the Non-Partisan ballot include all the presidential candidates?”

“No.” That tone. Stupid question from a stupid girl. She went on. “Here are the presidential candidates on the Independent ballot.”

I glanced down at it. Never heard of any of those people, frankly. It didn’t interest me in the slightest because I’d come in, all pumped up to vote for my candidate. I had a clear agenda and, suddenly, it was like I was being shown random carpet samples. “Uh, no, thank you,” I said.

I didn’t know what to do. I just stood there looking at the lady looking at me. I considered not voting, but couldn’t bear the thought. I always vote. I literally get choked up whenever I get to vote; it’s that big of a deal to me.

“So, uhm, what’s on the Non-Partisan ballot, then?”

“Oh, the propositions.”

“Nothing else?”

“No.”

I sighed. So frustrated. So mad at myself that I didn’t know this.

“Okay. I’ll take that one, I guess.”

I went into the cardboard box and proceeded to vote on a half dozen Indian gaming propositions that I don’t give two figs about. And poof! Then I was done.

Woo.

Hoo.

I feel like a total ass. Except for the major impact I made on Indian gaming.

One final thing: How come if you’re registered as “Non-Partisan” in CA, you’re offered the chance to vote Democrat but not Republican? Just seems weird to me. Is it like that where all the rest of you live? One party offered, but not the other?

Was I duped, pippa?

privilege

I can’t remember where I found this; it’s been sitting in my drafts for a while. A quiz to test how privileged you were/are.

Bold the true statements:

1. Father went to college.

2. Father finished college.

3. Mother went to college.

4. Mother finished college.

5. Have any relative who is an attorney, physician, or professor.

6. Were the same or higher class than your high school teachers. (What? I have no idea.)

7. Had more than 50 books in your childhood home.

8. Had more than 500 books in your childhood home.

9. Were read children’s books by a parent.

10. Had lessons of any kind before you turned 18.

11. Had more than two kinds of lessons before you turned 18.
(FYI: piano, flute briefly, tennis lessons with white-shorted hottie Wayne Weatherall. I was 14 and deeply in love. He was 20-something and very tan. If it weren’t for the presence of my pesky brother, who took lessons with me, niggling little laws against such relationships, and my crippling 2-week bout of impetigo where my face had to be slathered in sheer yellow goo, I’m sure I’d be a white-shorted Tracey Weatherall even now.)

12. The people in the media who dress and talk like me are portrayed positively. (You mean people who dress like this? Again, what?)

13. Had a credit card with your name on it before you turned 18.

14. Your parents (or a trust) paid for the majority of your college costs.

15. Your parents (or a trust) paid for all of your college costs.

16. Went to a private high school.

17. Went to summer camp.

18. Had a private tutor before you turned 18.

19. Family vacations involved staying at hotels.

20. Your clothing was all bought new before you turned 18.

21. Your parents bought you a car that was not a hand-me-down from them.

22. There was original art in your house when you were a child.

23. You and your family lived in a single-family house.

24. Your parent(s) owned their own house or apartment before you left home.

25. You had your own room as a child.

26. You had a phone in your room before you turned 18.

27. Participated in a SAT/ACT prep course.

28. Had your own TV in your room in high school.

29. Owned a mutual fund or IRA in high school or college.

30. Flew anywhere on a commercial airline before you turned 16.

31. Went on a cruise with your family.

32. Went on more than one cruise with your family.

33. Your parents took you to museums and art galleries as you grew up.

34. You were unaware of how much heating bills were for your family.

So … let’s see. There are 34 questions. I basically abstained on two. 12 bolds. I was/am 38% privileged. Woo-hoo! I have no idea what it all means, really, except that I guess it’s time for a shopping binge and a celebratory martini, dahling.